I like them all, but...

May 15, 2014,23:00 PM
 

 

The Freak is a piece that through the evolutions maintains it's core DNA.  I really like all the variations, which is something I can't say about a lot of other long running models, irrespective of Brand.

 

Overall, I like the modern, smoothed look of the cruiser.  I like the escapement better as well.  I'm undecided on the colored bezel insert and could probably do without it, but I appreciate it is part of the modern feel.

 

I do not like the size of the new models at 44mm+.  I really appreciate my original Freak at 42mm, and even at that size, it is a big chunk of gold.  Also, I just don't like the lock, or more precisely the printing on the lock, whether it says 28,800, Diavolo, Blue Phantom, or Blue Cruiser, I personally think it cheapens the piece a bit.

The integrated strap all the way back to original looks great, but is always a bit of a pet peeve with me as it makes strap choices very restrictive.

 

The watch works for me without a second hand given what it is (excepting the orbital tourbillon version) and I like its minimalism, which seems so complex (does that phrase work?).


The pin holding the movement that pierces the sapphire crystal doesn't bother me.  The newer versions that don't have this are clearly better, but I think it adds to the slightly "steampunk" feel of the original...at least when it first came out.

 

I bought one of the first pieces (low double digit serial number) back in 2002.  At that time the retail price was less than $28K.  It seemed like a lot to me then, but now I see what a great buy it was.

 

I watched for a number of years with apprehension around the escapement bugs of version 1.  Wondered (and worried) a bit if my piece would need to return to the factory for a complete retrofitting and become a version 1.5 as it became known.  I expect the upgrades were better, but I still feel fortunate that my piece remains original and functions without issue some 13 years later.  This period of time was interesting and given the ground breaking nature of the piece, didn't make me question or resent UN, only feel a bit like a test pilot with a precious new device.  I got one of the first Duometres (actually two in a month) that had issues and didn't feel quite the same way...albeit the Manufacture was brilliant and resolved immediately.

 

Lastly, this is THE watch that really started by obsession.  I was a collector before, but this put me in a different league in so many ways.  It also started a long relationship with an AD and a collection of UN pieces that I really cherish.

 

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Freak Blue Phantom: How do you like it? Cruiser or not Cruiser?

 
 By: amanico : May 12th, 2014-22:30
That is the question. The Cruiser Phantom, introduced this year ( ? ) : A redesigned Freak, with a 45 mm case, new bezel and dial. Or the Blue Phantom, which is an evolution of the first Freaks, 44, 5 mm case. Why " Phantom "? Because of the way the hour ...  

New Cruiser...

 
 By: andrewluff : May 13th, 2014-00:27
The original is an iconic piece, but I think the newer version has just been done so well and is so fitting for a nautical brand like UN. The use of the anchors on the escapement and the waves going around the bezel all put together make a beautiful freak... 

Still, I prefer the former versions. Except for the hands; which I find very cool, on the

 
 By: amanico : May 13th, 2014-03:19
Cruiser. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Andrew. Nicolas

Debatable….very debatable...

 
 By: moc : May 13th, 2014-02:13
Well I liked the old blue phantom a lot,but the new Cruiser is somehow fresher,its bridges are way more captivating,the rubber bezel insert makes it feel more technological ,the bezel pattern is new and refreshing…. I think overall the blue Freak Cruiser ... 

You are right, not a Diavolo. I was writing this post while thinking about the Diavolo. ;)

 
 By: amanico : May 13th, 2014-03:18
I like the new hands a lot, but still, prefer the former version. The new one, the Cruiser, is too big for my taste, I much prefer the bezel and the dial of the former générations, though, but it is a matter of taste, and no doubt that the Freak is still ... 

Of course, you have to see both of them live.

 
 By: amanico : May 13th, 2014-05:59
This is the only way to fully appreciate these weird birds... Best, Ronald. Nicolas

I have no preference.

 
 By: radone : May 13th, 2014-05:43
Any of the models would work for me. This is simply one of the most astonishing watches I have ever handled. Pure joy! ...  

It is the Cruiser for me.

 
 By: MichaelC : May 13th, 2014-08:54
This could be one of the few times I do not side with the original. I think the updates made to the Cruiser are terrific. The watch looks different - more modern - but very much follows the Freak DNA. A tribute to the original without being an exact copy.... 

Interesting input, my friend.

 
 By: amanico : May 13th, 2014-10:17
Another great point for the Cruiser compared to the original is the water resistance, which missed on the former. Your input makes real sense. Thank you! Best, Nicolas

Take away 3mm and I'll jump on it.

 
 By: TdotBean : May 14th, 2014-08:54
in light speed :D

I like the hands of the cruiser but the size of the freak one

 
 By: TdotBean : May 14th, 2014-17:54
Does the size of the movement stay the same? Regard Tyler

I like them all, but...

 
 By: Dave G : May 15th, 2014-23:00
The Freak is a piece that through the evolutions maintains it's core DNA. I really like all the variations, which is something I can't say about a lot of other long running models, irrespective of Brand. Overall, I like the modern, smoothed look of the cr... 

As long time owners of the Freak, we will easily favour the One.

 
 By: amanico : May 15th, 2014-23:18
It is hard to change your mind whe you are used to something. Yes, there are some interesting improvements, such as the water resistance, on the Cruiser, or the aesthetics of the " hands ", but maybe the original looks remains more " conceptual "? Interes... 

how bad is the original's vulnerability to water/shocks...etc?

 
 By: edlien : May 9th, 2020-02:40
hi Nico, as i m contemplating a freak purchase, a rg original freak is my 1st choice aesthetically

The original Freak is a beauty and 2mm smaller than everything that followed.

 
 By: russell996 : May 9th, 2020-04:57
I wouldn’t call it a robust piece and since the movement pin goes through the top sapphire it certainly has very limited water resistance. Many have had the movement upgraded to become Freak 1.5 for reliability (I believe this is automatically done at ser... 

thx russel for owners' insight :)

 
 By: edlien : May 9th, 2020-17:03
i had the impression that each iteration of freak kinda gains on water/shock resistance as it was mentioned in wei koh's zoomterview with patrick pruniaux that many wear their freak as daily to sport golf with np...tc

Watertightness is good ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : May 29th, 2014-15:45
... for everyday practicability. This already fully justifies my preference for the Cruiser, but I love its movement design as well. However, the classic Freak 28,800 would be my favourite. Marcus