WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Seiko

GS's visual design is lacking

 

An interesting question, Matt. Since you asked, here are the opinions from this USA citizen who has lived most of his life in California. Likes: JLC, VC, Hermes, Piaget. Dislikes: AP, Rolex, Hublot, Gerard-Perregaux.
“Regular” Seiko: A brand of high quality, producing reliable and sturdy watches in the $150-$800 range. Makes a vast number of models with a variety of visual styles. Probably slightly higher in quality than Citizen and Orient Star.
Grand Seiko: I have never seen a GS watch in the metal; I’ve never looked for them. I don’t even know if any dealers carry the brand here in San Francisco. From what I’ve read, I’m confident that GS watches offer excellent fit and finish, and good value for the money.
But one thing has held me back: the visual design language of GS dials. To my eye, GS watches are at best staid, bland and nondescript. They look like badly-designed 1950s watches. They lack style; they are neither utilitarian nor elegant, nor anything in-between. It is surprising, because I find Japanese art prints, for example, often to be very appealing with great visual interest, beautiful use of color, and harmonious balance. But I don’t see those characteristics in GS dials. If GS produced watches as attractive as Hajime Asaoka’s designs, THEN GS would be high on my list.
Ano “How about a GS watch equivalent of a Yozo Hamaguchi print?” Nuevo

  login to reply