holdemchamp1225
22901
Well mon ami, back then these were considered tool watches whereas nowadays and even in the 90s, the Daytona was already considered wrist jewelry and Rolex took full advantage...
so why not tell everyone how good you are:
Rolex
Oyster Perpetual
Superlative Chronometer
Officially Ceritifed
Cosmograph
Just seems like ALOT of text to me 🤷♂️🤦♂️
More posts:
Rolex 6239: The Chronograph which should have been called " Le Mans " and not Daytona?
The evidence? An advertising from 1964, found on the net ( credit unknown ). " It is called Le Mans ". I could take some pictures of an early 6239, dating from early 1963, with a serial number which is 923 xxx. The same that on the advertising, bracelet a...
Very nice watch and very interesting to realise that US$ 210.00 in 1964....
is equivalent to US$ 1'750.00 in 2020, adjusted for inflation! Cheers from cold Perth, Francois
Lovely watch that one; it has aged beautifully.
Of course it would look even better with a date Nicolas. Hehehe. Regards Kev.
It’s my grail daytona
And perhaps the only one I would need . Thanks for sharing Nicolas ! Sam
I thought this was already a well-known fact but I must have assumed it...
Yes, the original 6239 was supposed to be called the "Le Mans" and not the Daytona. There are several stories of why Rolex decided to change the name but I don't know if it is universally accepted that one is more accurate than the others. Another thing, ...
Well mon ami, back then these were considered tool watches whereas nowadays and even in the 90s, the Daytona was already considered wrist jewelry and Rolex took full advantage...
so why not tell everyone how good you are: Rolex Oyster Perpetual Superlative Chronometer Officially Ceritifed Cosmograph Just seems like ALOT of text to me 🤷♂️🤦♂️ ...
