willski
1171
Thanks guys
Already been to an AD...several times...that is what caused this conundrum!! :P My wrist in an AD is like a drunk man in a club...falls in love quite easily 
Thanks for the welcomes. The fact that they both have a long history do make them appealing. I would love to end up with both but I'm relatively young and am striving for (relative) fiscal discipline...how that will turn out the more I frequent this site remains to be seen 
To be honest I had no interest in the ceramic GMT as in pictures it just didn't do it for me; however, in person I was hooked! Beautiful watch! I read a lot of complaints about the PCL but I'm wearing a RO now so I can't imagine it'd be 'that' much different(?). Having said that, I'm sure we all have our suspicions of the 14060M being updated at Basel with new dial, bezel, clasp etc. so getting a new SubND before they're discontinued seems strangely appealing...I have a small wish to keep my watches for a long, long time and so to end up with vintage pieces that I purchased new. Perhaps as new models keep on coming out the trinky-dinky bracelet and clasp (which I've read is very comfortable) will turn into a unique merit (like Cindy Crawford's mole) or perhaps I'll think "this is a piece of..." 
Who knows?
Who knows?I also considered going the vintage route by primarily looking at, what else, 1680's (red submariners). However, I decided to go the new route and hopefully create my own (although good condition red subs with nice patina are gorgeous).
Thanks for the replies so far.
Best,
Will.
A question of preference - GMTIIc 116710 or SubND 14060M
Hi PuristS, First post! Been a lurker for a while and learnt an unbelievable amount of stuff from browsing these forums so thanks to all you contributors who make it easy to learn about watches vintage through new. Although, I don't think it's a place as ...
The Sub and the GMT are two watches with a long history.
Their modern iterations, the 116710, and the 14060 M are two dign sons of these iconic watches, with an almost 60 years of History. I would go for the 116710, because I am a sucker for these GMTs which therefore offer a friendly complication. The 116710, ...
ahhh.....yes.....
the word "or" should indeed be replaced in the dictionary with the word "and".....
Welcome here...
...and why not go to your Rolex AD and try on several models ? Maybe one will catch your eye ?
Now that is what I can sound advice.
Go directly to the source. Nothing like putting a watch on your wrist to get the right feeling. Best regards, George
Thanks guys
Already been to an AD...several times...that is what caused this conundrum!! :P My wrist in an AD is like a drunk man in a club...falls in love quite easily Thanks for the welcomes. The fact that they both have a long history do make them appealing. I wou...
Go for the Sub. Wearable and distinctive Rolex model. Unless you are a frequent
traveller who needs different time zones. Happy purchasing soon. The 14060M construction is less solid compared to GMT II but then again, it gives you that classic and vintage feel with no solid end links, with lug holes, simple folding clasp. You will li...
marlyn monroe or liz taylor
both are icons as is the sub and gmt both will give you great pleasure so choice is down to how you feel, the problem with rolex is its not good for your pocket, if you get one now you will yern for the other real soon good luck my friend
Thanks
Thanks again all for your opinions. I'm a big fan of these two, but also looking at some other options as well. As my collection in the short-medium term will be small, considering whether a leather strap dress (or indeed some other bracelet) watch would ...
GMT or Sub ?
A difficult question if you have to choose between the two ! I had similar dilemma two years back and finally bought the GMT. It has the look of a Sub along with utility of date as well as time zones. Hope this helps !