Bill
32066
Rolex Vintage: Advertising Models and Dates - Questions
We are always obsessing about validating the dates of vintage Rolex.
There are several ways of validating the date of your vintage Rolex but the biggest discrepancy always occurs when you have validated date of sale. That is to say we can reliably use a combination of the physical attributes like pointed crown guard are usually 1963 and earlier, Swiss only chapter ring seem also to be around the 1963 era, Chapter rings late 1950's to about 1962. Then we have serial numbers and case backs that give another indication of the born on date. One more not to be overlooked are the chronometer certificates. These certificates indicate when the watch was certified and these dates are generally around the model date. But even those certificates can be a year or two out either direction but at least dates the watch to with a reasonable period.
Now you throw into the mix the date of sale which is also generally within a year or two of the other dating mechanisms. Of course we have all seen watches sold new five six or even ten years later but those are outliers.
Ad for today's post and subject in question we have Rolex Advertising. Just look at these ads. The Brochure is copyright 1965 as seen on the last image but the two models shown are at best models from around 1961-1962 both the Submariner and the GMT are chapter ring models. So the question is was Rolex simply lazy and their agency just used stock photos or was Rolex actively marketing these models as watch available for sale in stores in 1965.
Never a dull moment with Rolex and so much more to learn.
Any thoughts to share.
Bill

Reference Guide
markLerman · Sep 10, 2010
Mark Lerman's definitive guide to the Rolex Red Submariner 1680. Learn about dial variations, case numbers, and collecting insights for this iconic vintage model.
30 replies92270 views

Vintage
Bill · Jan 11, 2020
Explore the Rolex 5513 Gilt Era (1962-1966) with Bill's expert report. Understand dial variations, serial numbers, and movement differences in this iconic vintage Submariner.
62 replies94351 views

Collection
Miles_151 · Jan 10, 2026
Miles_151 shares a personal story of acquiring a vintage Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513 with full provenance, reflecting on the changing landscape of watch collecting.
28 replies844 views

Vintage
Baron - Mr Red · Feb 8, 2014
Deep dive into the Rolex Submariner 6200, exploring its history, dial variations, and the debate over its status as the first Submariner. Essential for collectors.
43 replies39874 views

Vintage
amanico · Oct 14, 2009
In-depth review of the Rolex Explorer II Ref. 1655 'Freccione' by amanico, exploring its history, design, and market evolution. Essential reading for collectors.
123 replies153022 views
I agree on the mood photos.
By: Bill : May 23rd, 2014-12:02
It seems reasonable to use mood shots to creat emotional attachment but seems rather last to show models that are not current or is the reality that they are current models for sale even though they are several year old models. Have you seen the same with...
Hard to tell...
By: blomman Mr Blue : May 23rd, 2014-14:43
Since not many brands have that similar watches as Rolex, year passing. If you're not an expert, I guess it is hard to tell them apart... I think we can not always expect correct photos in ads and catalogs due to many reasons. Especially if it is a very s...
Hahaha
By: Mike1066 : May 23rd, 2014-18:16
I like how it is the Admiral that has on the dive watch! He's not the one getting wet! What's up with that?? I like the other advertisements more that showed the actual watch on the wrist of the actual diver. I agree that advertising adds yet another curv...
Very interesting, Bill.
By: amanico : May 23rd, 2014-22:35
And you have a point here. To me, the best way to date a Watch is to compare its serial number to the date reported Inside the case back. Then, I compare those informations with my data bank, and I see if it is coherent or no. Best, Nicolas.