reintitan
2622
In the early 2000s "nobody" wanted them
May 02, 2019,12:05 PM
and were considered ugly compared to Rolex Subs. They could be had for $2K - $3K. Now like everything else the prices have gone insane.
Comments:
view entire thread
🤣🤣 [nt]
By: agyzace : May 1st, 2019-11:56
Looks indeed very charming
By: MTR : May 1st, 2019-06:25
and appealing. I am searching for my first Tudor. And a model like this would be perfect. Top picture by the way! But that’s standard with your photos. ☺️
I will. ☺️
By: MTR : May 1st, 2019-12:32
After the horror stories about the bezel devastations of the Black Bay Bronze caused by salt water I’m not brave and courageous enough to buy that model. Best, Thomas
LOLLLLL!!
By: MTR : May 1st, 2019-17:19
Funny ... and spooky at the same time. I wonder if Rolex/Tudor has been able to solve this issue in the meantime? Best, Thomas
Not worthy of Tudor!
By: MTR : May 2nd, 2019-01:04
This was definitely the reason why I resisted to buy the Bucherer Edition which has in principle a good cost-benefit-relation.
I am afraid: yes.
By: MTR : May 2nd, 2019-01:23
AFAIK the construction is always the same. So the problem might also exist there. Anyway, I don’t want to take the risk of any troubles. Life is too short and there are many many wonderful watches out there working flawlessly without any problems. Quality...
👍 [nt]
By: MTR : May 2nd, 2019-09:09
+1 [nt]
By: reintitan : May 2nd, 2019-12:03
That‘s what
By: MTR : May 2nd, 2019-14:31
I have suspected.
Love these
By: reintitan : May 1st, 2019-15:30
My '82 MN Tudor Sub is one of my favorites in my entire collection. Definitely an heirloom piece.
In the early 2000s "nobody" wanted them
By: reintitan : May 2nd, 2019-12:05
and were considered ugly compared to Rolex Subs. They could be had for $2K - $3K. Now like everything else the prices have gone insane.
Got it.
By: neunelfs : September 12th, 2019-03:43
It looked like a pale blue In the photo. My mistake.