bimbeano
11737
Congratulations Richie Rich !
You once told me you were a "poor" bummer .... i didn't believe you and now for sure i still don't.
Best to you my rich friend, wear it in good health ...
PS. pm on the way ...
Filip
My First Rolex
By: G99 : July 8th, 2009-09:43
When i first joined this forum 2 years ago i knew nothing about Rolex other than some of the bad press associated with the 'bling' types who buy them. i was even under the misplaced impression that they used ETA calibres and the Submariner was no better t...
Big congrats Graham !
By: DrStrong : July 8th, 2009-09:59
and thanks for the great post, which illustrates that with a little bit of passion and knowledge you can wear a great looking vintage Rolex - with a high grade chronometer movement and a bulletproof oyster case - for the price of a dinner in a good restau...
Jeff, a very very very...
By: G99 : July 8th, 2009-10:28
Jeff, a very very very good Parisian restaurant i think :) i sort of got the impression on monday that if i didnt press the button you would so i had no choice but to go for it. it was well worth the press of that button. thanks again Graham
Jeff, the watches are great...
By: G99 : July 9th, 2009-03:16
Jeff, the watches are great for that year, but the prices are bad. i looked at one which looked original and had a heart attack. when my Longines Minute Repeater is serviced and sold i might well have money to buy one, but so many other priorities......aa...
IV 64, Graham?
By: amanico : July 8th, 2009-21:59
So the watch is for me! Big congrats, my friend!!! That is a timeless catch, and I'm sure you managed to pay it " Fifty Quids " )) Seriously, I envy you, Graham. Your 64 collection is geztting nicer and nicer. I'm trying to do the same but with less succe...
thankyou Darling Daos, i do...
By: G99 : July 9th, 2009-03:18
thankyou Darling Daos, i do wish i'd managed to get the airking with papers, but it was 3x the price. this is nice, original, discreet and hopefully accurate. you might find it a bit small at 34mm. its small for me, but as its vintage i accept that. you l...
Brilliant …
By: AndrewD : July 10th, 2009-07:59
Hi Graham, I have been away for a while but it’s nice to come back to see such a great watch added to your ’64 collection. I wouldn’t describe myself as a ‘Rolex kinda guy’ either, but I am trying to break from the stereotypes, and there is no better way ...
Silly me ...
By: AndrewD : July 10th, 2009-08:06
I should have started reading posts from where I left off 3 weeks ago, but I am working backwards and just read your serial number discussions below. I had the same difficulty as you. A lot of misinformation out there. It’s a pity Rolex itself doesn...
Andrew, dating is difficult...
By: G99 : July 10th, 2009-08:11
Andrew, dating is difficult and dr Strong will be the one to advise on this. many, but not all Rolexes have a year date in the caseback with the 4 quarters. ie mine is IV.64 indicating it was made in the 4th quarter of 1964. it has a 1.2mil serial number ...
Congrats Graham!!
By: drsh : July 13th, 2009-19:06
From one 64er to another!! I've been itching for a vintage Rolex circa 64 as well...just being sentimental....i am in the reading and research stage now and who knows maybe you will receive an annoying pm from me one dsy... (and to dr strong too...!) chee...
thanks SH. i'm not...
By: G99 : July 14th, 2009-02:39
thanks SH. i'm not sure i'm the right person to ask for advice as all mine came from Dr Strong. i know virtually nothing about Rolex. i'm very pleased with it, only about 2 secs a day slow, looks good, is a perfect addition to my collection of 64 classics...