Mark in Paris[Purist]
10488
Little correction
Maybe were you talking about the RM010 when mentioning the rotor, because the 055 doesn't have one
But with the RM010 you're surely going toward an excellent purchase.
RM035
By: Mark in Paris : May 21st, 2012-08:55
Hi Riddler, I've been digesting RM's collection these last months and I must say the RM035 is, imo, a perfect combination of RM's strenghs in that price section. The material, the high technics, the HL finishing, the size (not to big for me), the barrel s...
For me...
By: Mohannad (aka Riddler) : May 21st, 2012-12:50
Im a strong believer in the RM10 my first of the RM watches. IMHO I think the 10 is a classic amongst Richard Mille watches ( simple complications of course) the skeletonization is amazing and just right for me as well as size I know almost all love the 3...
Easy one for me
By: chris4 : May 22nd, 2012-00:25
RM055 all the way....the killer blow for me to the 35 is the solid back...the transparency of the 55 is pure essence of RM ...12 & 9 live on. I may have thought differantly if the 35 had a see through back ....
35 or 55
By: cisco : May 22nd, 2012-03:42
Both are great watches and a RM is, thought for tough conditions, great caliber, light. Best of RM in the three hands category. Black or White? dark and stealth or fresh and show off. Only Michael Jackson knows. Francois
55 or 35 for me too...
By: RahulR : May 22nd, 2012-19:50
I love the stealth of the 35. Although it has a solid case back I actually like the contrast of the movement to the background. I just wish it was the same size as the 55. As for the 55, I love the size, the clear case back so you can see the movement at ...
Tough choice...
By: mrmar23 : May 23rd, 2012-00:48
I am still hunting my first RM and It's the one I love most, the RM10 either in Ti or RG I have yet to decide. Now if I could squeeze a bit more liquid I would jump at the 55, the rotor and skeleton movement is stunning, all with an opened back!