CL
2722
It's my error, sorry......
I mean ref.1463 but all your points still valid 
Thank you very much.
Cheers,
CL
1436!!!
By: aaronm : October 9th, 2009-10:26
but it's not a fair fight in the least. Patek makes far more perpetual's of any design than they've made rattrapantes of all designs. The 3448 is a lovely watch, but I don't see "magic" in it. For wearing purposes, rather than going in the vault, never to...
More information ....
By: jellybean : October 9th, 2009-18:49
Mr. CL, i am going to be honest, 1436 is a split chrono, 3448 being a perpetual is nowhere close. Because both are vintage pieces, the choice of metal does merit , lets say, 1436J vs 3448P, rarity will get points added into your consideration. Condition i...
Vintage V's Modern
By: Roni M : October 9th, 2009-23:47
Whilst the others have made very valid observations about both references and indicate that it is preferable to go for a modern rather than vintage I do think,for me at least,part of the thrill of vintage watches besides finding the model if it is rare is...
Agree with you Roni....
By: CL : October 10th, 2009-08:24
Wearing vintage is a total different experience to a modern piece. As much as I love the 5970, it lacks the appeal and allure of a 3448 when presented to me. Maybe 5 years from now, the 5970 will have the similar appeal as 3448 *CL
1463 vs 3448 .....
By: jellybean : October 10th, 2009-01:20
.... well, well, well. Slightly different, but a much closer fight. Lets see, i personally would narrow down the following : 1463J vs 3448J - i pick 3448J 1463ss vs 3448J - no doubt 1463ss 1463J vs 3448G - 3448G in a heart beat 1463R vs 3448J - 1463R 1463...