I really like the slightly larger size of the latter and the slightly more modern look. So I think 5327 is it. The cream colored dial with the rose gold is beautiful too.
When I look at a 5140, lovely as it is, all I can think is that it's a slightly larger and less perfect version of the 3940. The 5327 does its own thing, and it's a good thing. Love those numerals and the swoopy scalloped case.
... and between the 5140 and the 3940 it is just 1.2mm IIRC. In my eyes Patek's three sub-dial PC has been getting a little less attractive with every new iteration. The beautiful balance of the 3940 has been lost on the way of upsizing the watch w/o modi...
I keep going back-and-forth between 5140 and5327. I really like the slightly larger size of the latter and the slightly more modern look. So I think 5327 is it. The cream colored dial with the rose gold is beautiful too.
I thought I'd prefer the 5327, but the 5140 looks more classic and timeless. Maybe it's the LED (?) lighting, but the 5327 looks washed out and a bit plain.
too "black". It seems to stand out too much relative to the beautiful rose Breguet numerals. The black printing on the silver dial looks more natural. Just a comment after a quick look.
...where this is pronounced. And other versions where I don’t see it at all. I am sure that there are experts on this forum that have more knowledge in this area. If the 3940 is a non-starter, then I would go with the 5140, ‘squished’ numerals and all... ...
But I think it’s the 5140 for me. I find that the baton markers help to draw my attention towards the dial, and on the whole keeps a busy looking dial less busy if you know what I mean. The Roman numerals on the 5327 makes the watch look a bit too ‘rich’,...