Desiring a see-through case back on the Patek Philippe 5738, this article delves into the author's hesitation in purchasing this iconic timepiece. | Patek Philippe

Am I the only one that regrets that 5738 does not have a see-through case back.

Am I the only one that regrets that 5738 does not have a see-through case back.

I'm well aware that this is such an icon that goes way back and I also get the concept that sometimes *less is more*.... but I cannot help but think that I wish that this watch came with a see-through case back. Not sure why, but honestly right now that is the one and only reason why do I not own this watch yet. That 240 in this watch is just perfect and it's a shame that we cannot see it.

When I was at the Patek Geneva salon a couple of weeks ago I tried on the Platinum version and it fit me like a glove. The desire was strong!!

I know that it would probably add half or three quarters of a millimeter to the overall thickness, but this is such a thin watch to begin with, where I don't think it would really matter at all.

Anyone else feels the same way?

💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe›

Personally…

By: KMII : April 27th, 2025-03:21

I’m quite happy with their decision of a solid case back. While the movement has nothing to hide, on a thin dress watch I do not consider the ability to see the movement to be critical, especially on a time only piece. But it is possible that PP might eve...

I definitely feel like you.

By: quattro : April 27th, 2025-04:07

I think solid is better on this one...

By: mdg : April 27th, 2025-03:31

...as it is not a shaped movement for one thing, and there would have to be some sort of spacer. And I could be wrong, but would a sapphire back add just a hair to the thickness?

Sorry...I see you addressed the thickness part...

By: mdg : April 27th, 2025-03:32

...but I think this watch should be as thin as possible. Besides, you know they wouldn't lower the price, and gold costs more than glass : )

Good point, I agree completely.

By: quattro : April 27th, 2025-04:07

I agree that exhibition case backs should be more

By: seabas132 : April 27th, 2025-03:35

of the norm. Nevertheless, this is such a quintessential classic that it can be overlooked. I just say - that does fit you amazingly! - Sebastian

I understand your point, but feel differently for the following reasons.

By: quattro : April 27th, 2025-04:05

First, as you say, a see-through case back would make this watch slightly thicker and I consider its slimness (5.9 mm !) to be one of its strengths (its a sort of "complication" in itself). Then, this model isn't about displaying anything: it's simplicity...

Love the engraving idea...

By: mdg : April 27th, 2025-05:31

...the new reference with the bracelet is stunning...

I'm glad you like this idea too.

By: quattro : April 27th, 2025-06:06

And, yes, this bracelet model feels truly amazing on the wrist. I wish you a great Sunday. Best, Emmanuel

As is so often the case, I think Emmanuel has said it best

By: blau : April 27th, 2025-11:19

Oh, thank you for the very kind words

By: quattro : April 27th, 2025-12:26

and have a great Sunday! Best, Emmanuel

Slim and at the same time being accurate is the goal of fine watchmaking.

By: COUNT DE MONET : April 28th, 2025-19:12

Interesting suggestion for the Ellipse ! With a

By: GLau : April 27th, 2025-10:32

round movement, a transparent back showing the total area might be inappropriate. I agree with quattro that the solid back-cover serves as a great place for engraving. Personally I would not let this point hold me back from buying a piece I really love (i...