Hampusw
86
Agree
I agree on this, there is a substantial difference between the two and it's all about personal preference. Im happy with my 5165 but I'd rather have a 5167 and only bought the 38mm beacuse I got it at a good price and the timing was right. Make sure you try them first and choose the one that fits you best.
H
Available on the marketplace
size question 5165 Vs. 5167
dear all, we all know that the 5165 is 38mm and the 5167 is 40mm. if you take a close look at patek's website however, you can clearly see that: 1. the 5165 is 38mm excluding the crown (in essence the diameter of the bezel) 2. the 5167 is 40mm including a...
Size
I have a 5167 and a friend of mine has a 5165. You can clearly see the difference in size between the two watches: you would not confuse one for the other. The website is clearly wrong. Patek measures its watches the same way so what you see on the websit...
Agree
I agree on this, there is a substantial difference between the two and it's all about personal preference. Im happy with my 5165 but I'd rather have a 5167 and only bought the 38mm beacuse I got it at a good price and the timing was right. Make sure you t...
Presicely, my dear Watson
I was in exactly the same situation and decided to do what our mutual friend suggested (i.e. see the watch and try it on before you make a final decision). I had all but decided on a 5165 - until I saw them together at the same time and went for the 5167....
Patek do make mistakes by the way...
For those of you who have the 2009-2010 catalogue, check out p104. The 5167A is in fact a picture of the 5165 (also shown on p 107)
.
thank you for your feedback so far. interested to hear more views from out there, if any.
i made the mistake of not
trying before i buy. I was really dissapointed with the 5165 as it felt to small on my 7 inch wrist.i quickly sold it and only re purchased the 5167 at the begining of the year. Theres a noticable difference in size and the dial colour is far nicer as wel...