oli_767
11
5227g Tiffany dial - Question
Dear Fellow-PP friends, Iāve got a question regarding a beautiful 5227g that I could get my hands on. Ref 5227 was officially introduced in April 2013ā¦ Is anybody familiar with how that watch could have made itās way through the NY Tiffany boutique in August 2012, six months before the official disclosure? Would appreciate if anybody has experience with similar glitches š¤
Available on the marketplace
2,837 Patek Philippe listings are live on the eBay market and 1721 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
Reference Guide
Mark in Paris recaps 2016 Patek Philippe articles and previews 2017 Aquanaut and Caliber 240 anniversaries. Essential guide for collectors.
30 replies149252 views
Review
Explore the Patek Philippe 5227R Calatrava with a hands-on review. Discover its modern updates, officer's case back, and collector insights.
53 replies50879 views
Review
Explore the Patek Philippe 5940G black dial perpetual calendar. Mark in Paris reviews its cushion case, legibility, and Patek's dial strategy.
47 replies41962 views
Review
First look at the Patek Philippe 5227G black dial Calatrava. Mark in Paris shares photos and thoughts on this elegant dress watch.
29 replies22931 views
Reference Guide
Baron explores Patek Philippe Calatrava's design DNA, comparing vintage Ref. 570G with modern Ref. 5227G. Discover the enduring style.
22 replies5565 views
Collection
Explore Patek Philippe's practical dated Calatrava references. Anaroku showcases automatic models like 3998G, 5127/1G, and 5296G, revealing their understated appeal.
22 replies5535 views
5227g Tiffany dial - Question
Dear Fellow-PP friends, Iāve got a question regarding a beautiful 5227g that I could get my hands on. Ref 5227 was officially introduced in April 2013ā¦ Is anybody familiar with how that watch could have made itās way through the NY Tiffany boutique in Aug...
I never buy a watch that has an air of uncertainty
Here are some genuine Tiffany dial stamps owned by a grey market dealer. Be careful. ...
Thanksā¦
ā¦ important information indeed. But the strange thing is the matching reference/ movement/ case numbers with the stated sales date. You would confuse the day maybe, but usually not the year (especially as we are talking warranty here, too). Tiffany &Co on...
Wow that is crazy!
I would love to have an authentic Tiffany stamp. But maybe a damaged scrap one. Who ever that grey market person is, if they use thatā¦I donāt ever want to buy anything from them
Interesting!
But if an honest and genuine piece, perhaps the year is wrong as a mistake. It's a human salesperson handwriting the date. It's not like anyone can actually foresee the future and reference number!
Correctā¦
ā¦ indeed. Will try to retrieve more info from the archives. Itās either a very odd setting or a very early, special piece. Who would put effort into counterfeiting papers to match an existing and legit watch, and make the watch older than it actually is a...
Contact PP.
Unfortunately, I have had "the pleasure" of seeing fake PP Tiffany, stamped dials, and made papers. As in your case, the price difference between the Tiffany and the normal one is not big, I would bet on a mistake, a date added later, or a pre-release sal...
Hello Oliver, and welcome to the forum. Ref. 5227 was indeed introduced in 2013, including this specific G-001 iteration (later discontinued).
To clear any doubts on its legitimacy and whether it was simply a typo on the certificate, I'd advise you to contact Patek directly. I'm reluctant to give out internal numbers for obvious reasons, but we have a boutique ('Maison') right there in Shanghai ...
Thanks for all the hints and valuable informationā¦
ā¦ I will have the service center here in Shanghai check the watch. Hope itāll turn out as a spellow or a pre-sale. Both would be fine for me. Will post the outcome whenever thereāll be news from the SC or PP archives. š¤š»
Different font of the last 2
Not sure why? But how come same person writes the last 2 in ā2012ā differently!!
Also my first thought...
... and another part of the odd setting. Because, if you put effort into the whole thing, why not write 2019 but a non-production year?