Patek Philippe

HI folks, Both being very simillar in all their unique ways and terms that includes,outllook-size,dial and etc.And the beating with the same heart. If you have in your possession both of them,which one will take the most of your wrist time? Just curious..... 

the VC over the Patek mainly because of its size 41.5mm over 43mm for the Patek. On the wrist the difference is noticeable and I'm not as comfortable with the larger piece with my wrist size: PP: VC: I also prefer the non-truncated numerals on the VC and ...  

5070 is 42 mm (and not sure whether VC is accurately described at 41.5 mm, but my impression is that they are basically the same size). We could start a long thread again about finishing of Patek vs VC on the Lemania chrono movement. But regardless of thi... 

1) I prefer the square pushers over the round. 2) The cleaner dial of the Patek.

Hi fernando, Many thanks on the pic loaded and inputs on both wg pieces. Some commented that, i.For popular reason patek is for keeping....and therefore obviously vc is to wear. ii.IMO comparison in terms of dial VC is much livelier than patek. Well....i ... 

No message body

But if you look at older posts I've posted you'll see that I LOVE the VC too. I never had one but maybe one day I will. I must say that I would prefer the previous one, the new model is imo not so nice. Still a great watch but yours looks better. So yes, ... 

it's dial cleaner vs VC and give the feel smile at you...this is just me

and the Malte is a really fine chrono made at the highest level, BUT in order for the Malte to beat out the 5070, it has to be the plat. LE of 50. The wg and rg are obviously watches of great beauty, but the Plat LE......... is my choice. Now what if it w...