RM

Sep 27, 2008,00:26 AM
 

I've tried both and the RM is a hands down winner. It looks much better on the wrist than on the photos.  Maybe it looks cheap to the general public but its design and construction is as modern and high tech as it gets.

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

If you had to get one of these - which would it be?

 
 By: markkeenan : September 25th, 2008-09:34
The Patek Aquanaut 5167 The Richard Mille RM010 in Titanium Although I like the RM - Feel that the Vaucher movement is a little too simple to justify the price (perhaps also true of the Aquanaut), but I do feel (with absolutely no grounds whatsoever, and ...  

I would much prefer the PP

 
 By: Topcat30093 : September 25th, 2008-11:45

PP

 
 By: zjpj : September 25th, 2008-14:37

RM010

 
 By: Elbow : September 25th, 2008-18:03
Not the best picture (RM's always look better in the flesh) and the white gold is nicer than the TI IMO. The 5167, whilst not hideous, is certainly an ugly watch. Try both on and they're so different, one will speak to you more than the other

A better picture?

 
 By: Elbow : September 25th, 2008-18:07
...  

RM

 
 By: naliga : September 25th, 2008-20:03

Great picture - thank you [nt]

 
 By: markkeenan : September 27th, 2008-14:05

RM [nt]

 
 By: mindara : September 25th, 2008-20:25

RM010 no doubt

 
 By: Dje : September 25th, 2008-22:32

Have to go RM

 
 By: gazoz : September 26th, 2008-01:29

the answer is obvious

 
 By: Cookies : September 26th, 2008-01:59

Between the 2, My pick is also RM

 
 By: happyguy1688 : September 26th, 2008-04:23
I prefer RM010 Ti or (I owned) RM005FM. To me the Nautilus or Aquant are ugly watches. My favorite simple PP is 5124G or 5196P

My wife innocent comments

 
 By: phelipcopter1 : September 26th, 2008-07:16
My wife thinks RM is ugly and look cheap. AP ROO looks better if you want a big watch.

RM

 
 By: prec_loc : September 27th, 2008-00:26

take the 5167

 
 By: nothing but time : September 28th, 2008-12:36

5167 no doubt

 
 By: paulus : October 3rd, 2008-01:28