One of the last 3970R from the last series and a 5270G from the first series. 41 vs. 36 mm. So different but so alike. Both sizes are great to wear. I really love them both 😍 ...
I prefer the 3970 to the 5970. The 5970 had the case upsized but not the movement and it shows. When you look at the 3970, it’s proportions are consistent throughout. You think the 5270 is well balanced. I even am ok with the “chin” models, though those n...
and also, the new in-house movement is way better with a number of patents. Regardless, we also cannot ignore the 3970 and 5970 given the historical significance. If budget is not an issue, then get all three models. Can't go wrong with any of the PCC ref...
Forgot to add that the 1st gen 5270G-001 doesn't get enough love or appreciate for what it was at the time and how clean the dial is compared to other variant. Maybe one day it will get more shine 😉
3970 is a stunner for me with its classic design. A pretty full dial, lovely case and wonderful old-school movement. My 5270 is a G of the very first series with its spacious and clean dial design which I love. Case is of classic style and the in-house mo...
I love everything about the 3970 apart from the most crucial for me its proportions. As hard as I have tried it just doesn’t look right on my wrist. “The hamburger “ is just too small and too thick for me. The 5270 leaves me cold also with lacking Patek D...
The 5970 is a nice watch but for me the dial is too busy and the small movement doesn't really match with the case. Somehow an oversized 3970 with a tachymeter scale. But all this is complaining on very high level. But what do you mean with lacking Patek ...
With their none in house Lemania movements with Geneva seal and smaller size case look more vintage. IMO the 5970 was the last nod to the long vintage line. To me this is Patek DNA and the 5270 is a modern watch which is absolute genius as a PCC but it ju...