I am having a difficult time deciding between the Journe CS, the Lange Richard Lange and the Patek 5130 World time (pretty different from the other two I realise). From an aesthetic point of view I find the Journe particularly appealing, but some reports I've read about problems with reliability are giving me cold feet; perhaps these only concern the more complicated models... The Lange is also a very handsome timepiece, and the Patek has a lot going for it as well... The only watch I own for now is a JLC Master perpetual which has never had any problems and still gives me much pleasure. I guess what I4m seeking is the reassurance that the Journe is every bit as good as the other two and that I should go ahead and buy it.. Any guidance would be much appreciated. J

Manual or automatic are both fine, though come to think of it, I haven't had a manual since I was a little boy (a long, long time ago).
Although I admire all three marks .
I personally wouldn't benefit from the world timer.
The lange is a fantastic brand and the movements are absolutely stunning, but I am not a fan of the dial with its Roman Numerals.
The CS, is a great watch very accurate as well as being reliable and again the movement made from R/G is another very beautiful piece.
I very much like the layout of the dial, especially having a power reserve indicator, which I feel is a good complication to have in a manual wind watch.
And if the wearing on the wrist is anything like the 40mm Calendrier, then it is a very comfortable watch to wear.
As has already been mentioned you are in a very enviable position.
.. that you've got a nice problem to have!! Whatever you decide out of these 3 in the end you'll have a great sample from the elite.
Those 3 watches are very different watches so it really depend on what you like. Which metals are you thinking of?
With RL, the look is understated classic. The roman numerals dial make it the best dress watch out of the 3. Langes are VERY solid and feel substantial on the hand or wrist. Craftsmenship is really the best you can get and the finishing is jaw dropping. Need to say no more about "german engineering".
CS, in my opinion are amazingly accurate. The dial design is very unique and "signature" Journe. The CS being it's iconic piece. It'll be thinner and not feel as substantial than the RL though. The rose gold movement is a nice sight to behold.
The 5130 is the most complicated out of these 3, and Patek is afterall Patek. Finishing will also be top notch and easily the most recognisable brand out of the 3.
At the end of the day it really depend on what you want as your second watch after a Master Perpetual. If you want more complications, the 5130 fits the bill. If you want a simpler watch to go with the already complicated Master Perpetual, then RL or CS. Another important factor is whether you want everybody to know your watch or you're the kind of person that like to appreciate it secretly (I'm the latter type). With the 5130, everyone will see a Patek Philippe, but not everyone (apart from us here!) would know about Lange and Journe.
Finally as we always say, the most deciding factor is how you feel about it on your wrist. You'll have to try it all on and see which one sings to you the most! For this amount of money you would want to get the biggest enjoyment out of it! At the moment you sound like you perfer the aesthetic of CS over the other 2 so I assume you have tried them on already. If Journe speaks to your the most, I can't think of a reason for not going for that.
Good luck with your choice and please let us know how it goes!
But yet a difficult decision… I would have a bit of a hard time deciding between the Journe and Lange but, at the end, I would probably get the Richard Lange.
Whatever's the choice, you will own a superb watch - that's for sure
Marcelo
for your informative and helpful comments. I went back to the Journe shop here in Paris today to take a second look at the CS, then on the way back home stopped by another jeweller's to look at the Lange. Increasingly I'm tending toward the CS, in its 38mm version. It sits really well on my wrist, and is very, very appealing. The Lange is a magnificent watch too, but just a little too bulky for my taste. As for the Patek, the model that I really liked initially was the clous-de-Paris Calatrava with plain white dial face and Roman numerals. The problem was the small size, it looked a bit too fey when I tried it on, so I ruled it out in favour of the 5130, the only other Patek watch in my price range that I found pleasing (that statement probably betrays crass ignorance on my part). But the more I think about it, the more I realise that my preference is for simple, uncluttered designs. Anyway, as soon as I've come to a decision you'll be the first to know. Thanks again,
Jea

. I own one of the most problematic ones, the Resonance. But I have the good fortune of owning a lucky 'perfect' piece, pre-owned, discontinued and tested. I had this for many months now and it's dead accurate, none of those problems happen to my piece (yet
). I'm happy that the previous owner tested it and paid for the depreciation value before parting it to me, what can I ask for ? 
