Personally, I am not bothered by the current date mechanism...
By: MichaelC : December 14th, 2021-22:07
It goes with the charm of that particular Royal Oak. But why not update it? Perhaps they will use a newer in-house movement that offers a quickset date. Cermet, absolutely. For all the criticism of AP doing too many versions of things, they have mostly always kept the reigns on this reference. Let her breathe, I say!
Sometimes the quirks and features add to the charm and uniqueness of this model. I guess it’s more important to keep with the original base movement and it’s features.
Amazing still that anything that is 50 years older looks so classic and timeless…whereas in the area of Rolex there have been moderate changes to models like the Sub (crystal, bezel, materials, dimensions, etc), the Royal Oak seems to be pretty close to the original. Maybe that’s why it has been so successful!
Although the date adjustment is still better than the 24h non quickset mechanisms it is still a pain to adjust. The 15202 I find is the nicest looking RO but I wouldn’t mind a movement update. Just to be clear it shouldn’t be on the expense of the size and thickness of the watch. That is perfection!
I am fond of the 15300 with the 3120 movement. I do not mind the modest increase to 9.4mm. I like the overall size and the classic white date wheel. I would, however, prefer two hands, though I go back and forth on this.
Micro Adjustment without tools should be the standard.
By: rip9er : December 15th, 2021-13:25
VC overseas has a fantastic micro adjust function and now even Lange has. I don’t even want to talk about Rolex Omega Jlc Iwc and Tudor who are in a different price class