WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

It’s not a question of having the money!

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-04:38
But personally I would never torture even a mass produced PP to make it customized. I would though do it to a Rolex.

What's the difference in this case between PP and Rolex? Why the distinction? [nt]

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : September 1st, 2018-05:17
No message body

The end product and finishing

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-05:23
Also the price! I would not let anyone play with my aquanaut even if it makes it unique. All of the warranties are voided and the resell value is close to nothing unless you find someone with the same taste and with deep pockets.

It's a lot more palatable to mod a Seiko than a Patek, for most people at least. That's understandable.

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : September 1st, 2018-07:10
I don't think anyone is thinking there is any real resale on these modded pieces, you buy them or make those changes knowing that.
Personally I've really like some of the stuff Bamford has done in the past. I wasn't ever convince however that it as worth the premium being applied.

For me

 
 By: tom2517 : September 23rd, 2018-03:37
I felt safe with Rolex because plenty of people can service them even if the warranties were void.

My take on it FWIW.

 
 By: Wristenthusiast : August 31st, 2018-14:23
I just rarely see customizing that is done to anywhere near the level of quality of the original watch (Bamford I'm looking at you).
Also, when I see customizing that basically destroys what made that particular watch great, I cringe.

Examples: DLC coating a nautilus. That watch is known for its mirror/satin polish and you did a half ass dlc coating over it? Or even when the bracelet of nautilus is bathed in diamonds. It's just feels like you could have done that on a different watch.

That's just me. No I would not mod my 5980/A1

I agree!

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-04:41
The finishing in a PP is as good as any customized watch if not better.


I'm not into customization, but I reckon that some watches are cool [nt]

 
 By: 1WatchMan : August 31st, 2018-15:36
No message body

I Agree Sir! [nt]

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-04:42
No message body

It’s another for of engraving.

 
 By: jomni1 : August 31st, 2018-18:45
As Long as the owner intend to keep it, he doesn’t need to worry about resale value.

I know! But!

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-04:43
Engraving is a bit different. It customize the watch without changing the DNA completely.

a matter of taste.....for sure

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : September 1st, 2018-11:35
I did it once on a Rolex and have always regretted doing so. I won't ever do it again. But i can see why some people like it. It isn't for me.

I it’s to my taste either

 
 By: Saz : September 1st, 2018-12:05
I saw it once on a Rolex.The seller was telling me that it was sitting there for a few years, he tried to make it appealing to me because it fitted my wrist since he didn’t have extra links. I wan’t interested!
Best,
SAZ

I wouldn’t do it, but I don’t really have any opinion if others do it... [nt]

 
 By: FRAMII : September 2nd, 2018-05:14
No message body

I have a Bamford Deepsea lol

 
 By: tom2517 : September 2nd, 2018-18:34




Nice mod!

 
 By: Saz : September 2nd, 2018-23:33
Is this the bad guy from Popey the sailor man?

Yes, Brutus. [nt]

 
 By: tom2517 : September 3rd, 2018-06:38
No message body

In my opinion it's the horologic equivalent of "Hover Lights" or "Spinners"

 
 By: Mean Solar Time : September 8th, 2018-19:21
Look, ... if it's your watch you can do whatever you want?

I would think, however, that most of the people who enjoy Patek Philippe reference(s) do so because they' are UNDERSTATED?

I agree! Your watch your decision!

 
 By: Saz : September 14th, 2018-11:05
But do it in with good taste.
Load More Comments >>