Comments:
What is the myth? That a human who's not a bilateral leg amputee and is only 4 ft tall can fit in the back seat? Other than that that thing looks fantastic!
A " ... human who's not a bilateral leg amputee and is only 4 feet tall". The word you want is 'child', I think. Lotus drivers have them sometimes. I did. :-)
Perhaps you are thinking about the infamous Car & Driver column where a writer said "Suitable only for Thalidomide babies"?
which got hundreds if not thousands of subscriptions cancelled.
Look up Thalidomide baby if you don't know what I am talking about.
Cazalea
What vehicle prompted that clever comment? I've looked at some early Broncos (or were they International Scouts?) where the seat was already pushed fully back and the
steering wheel was in a position that would only allow an anorexic 90 lb man to fit in it... and he would probably need extremely short arms!
Love the looks 🙌🏻👍🏻
I guess our kids are already too large to put them in the back but a nice option to have with smaller children 😊
That is such a pretty Lotus
The only time I drove a Lotus was in the early 80's when I took a test drive of one I was considering buying, whilst on said test drive a front wheel fell off when going round a corner thankfully it wasn't at speed. No I didn't end up buying it after that.
Marc
You reminded me of a Lotus test drive also perhaps in the 80's
It was an Esprit with a Ford SHO (Yamaha) engine stuffed in back.
The car crapped out and we walked about 2 miles back to the store... salesman asked if that would put me off buying it.
YES, it put me off. I'm still sore about it.
I was interested until the interior shot which reminds me I need to get my car washed and vacuumed out