




i like the Dial Layout and color scheme.
thanks for posting
Thanks for the instructive post.
Considering that the type XXII wiht the HF movement features an impressive innovation, i think it has not received the attention it deserves. I find the 30 seconds totalizer way better than the solution with a small aperture that was shown a year ago on the 2010 presentation model. Obviously the unanimous critique of the PuristS was heard by Breguet.
The 30 second totalizer might be still not that easy to read but it seems tat with a little bit of practice it can be done without too much trouble.
I agree with the other comments that using two subdials for a second timezone is not a good choice for a chronograph. Wouldn't the logical choice be to use the subdial at 6 for the hourcounter? (this is a chronograph, after all). One subdial is sufficient to show a second time zone, if this is reallz needed.
Finally, the keywholes on the back of the case are not my cup of tea. In fact, it doesn't look bad, but it is not consistent. If you have a nice movement and you want to show it, make a crystal back. If you dont want to show it or the type of watch does not allow for a crystel back, fair enough, a solid case back is the solution. Everything inbetween does not make sense to me.
Overall, certainly an interesting extension of the XX collection - i am looking forward to see it metal.
Best,
Stefan
You have to see it in metal but I find it challenging to read. Aesthetically it is better to drop the initial aperture for 30sec totalizer, it may be easier to read.
