Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
34923
Yours is from one of the later batches, if memory . . .
Apr 17, 2019,06:01 AM
. . . serves correct, Thomas, without 'US Army' engraving on the back. In my opinion, it's still a military as it would've originally been delivered under contract to the War Department, probably well after cessation of hostilities.
Best,
Art
Comments:
view entire thread
I love . . .
By: Dr No : April 14th, 2019-16:42
. . . your whole collection, Thomas. Seriously! The vintage on my wrist earlier this week was one . . . . . . you also own. Currently wearing the ref 2366 . . . . . . on my way down to Santa Monica to visit a fellow Omega-phile. Best, Art ...
Fortunately, 2179 is one of the easier references . . .
By: Dr No : April 15th, 2019-15:18
. . . to hunt. Its American stablemate 2384 is much tougher. Produced earlier and in smaller quantity, with a pleasingly thick profile. I've never found one at an opportune moment. Now that I have two Omega military references . . . [ ca '43 ref UK2292 le...
Thanks :-)
By: tdn.dk : April 17th, 2019-03:40
I collect different than many others, only vintage Omega Have a variety from 1903-1970's Omega's, Gent watches, pocket watches, timers. Yes have a 2179 but the civilian version ...
Yours is from one of the later batches, if memory . . .
By: Dr No : April 17th, 2019-06:01
. . . serves correct, Thomas, without 'US Army' engraving on the back. In my opinion, it's still a military as it would've originally been delivered under contract to the War Department, probably well after cessation of hostilities. Best, Art
Yes [nt]
By: tdn.dk : April 17th, 2019-06:38
No message body ...