Chromatic Fugue
1903
same dilemma here
I'm trying to make a similar choice: new PO 42 mm vs. new GO SE -- I don't have any dive watches and am looking for my first. Your PO 45 is, I think, somewhat larger than the SE, which is advertised as 42 mm.
Does anyone here have a wrist shot of the LE? I've always wondered how one would look on my (thin) wrist, and there aren't any GO ADs within 200 miles of me to enable me to try one on myself before my next trip to the big city (NY; I live in Washington DC, where no one seems to care about watches). Thx.
same dilemma here
By: Chromatic Fugue : July 17th, 2008-18:54
I'm trying to make a similar choice: new PO 42 mm vs. new GO SE -- I don't have any dive watches and am looking for my first. Your PO 45 is, I think, somewhat larger than the SE, which is advertised as 42 mm. Does anyone here have a wrist shot of the LE? ...
TWO diferent worlds
By: Mostel : July 18th, 2008-21:30
the PO is a real knockaround true everyday watch that you can really 'live in', as nice as it is. The GO SE is a fancy watch, extremely bulky and heavy and THICK, more on the art-side than the sport side, and a tank of a watch--amazing detail and quality ...
One Reply
By: db darien : July 19th, 2008-07:46
I won't disagree with your characterization of the GO SE as "art" and how you treat it. But I've owned and worn both watches, for an extended period of time. I can tell you, unequivocally, that the PO outweighs the GO and, due to its 45 mm case, is bigger...
How Long
By: db darien : July 19th, 2008-12:26
I've continuously owned Omega Seamasters for 15 years and have had the current PO for over a year. I've owned Glashuttes for the past two years and owned the SE for about six months. I wore both continuously. I traded-in the SE to get my current G.O. Navi...