gatorcpa
440
I highly doubt that claim...
...Maybe as a pocketwatch, it did. But since the case (along with any military markings that were on it) has been destroyed, there is no way to prove it.
Omega made a lot of watches under contract for the Allied forces in WWII (UK, US and Australia). The only Omega watches I've seen for the other side were personal watches that were engraved with commemorations of service.
Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
Give it back
By: Franco : January 25th, 2014-15:58
... the only original part is the movement. Omega never supplied watches to the German forces, it is only known of civilian watches that result sold to the Wehrmacht in the Omega ledgers. But never assigned as such. At any rate, any sensible proof of mili...
Little More Info
By: vinny6737 : January 26th, 2014-13:31
Little more research shows the 'arrow' is a German Army Ordinance Mark stamped(marked) on all German Military Property. The ser # is linked to a 1912 movement on the Omega DataBase. The reason it appears to be a pocket watch(large Crown) is that it was st...
Your research is pathetic
By: Franco : January 26th, 2014-15:06
How can you say that the broad arrow is a symbol of german government property? It is the PHEON, hystorically found on all property of BRITISH government. All miltary watches by the British Misnistry of Defense, down to the clothes of imprisoned inmates i...
Dancing Pilot
By: Franco : January 27th, 2014-00:45
... you write Automatic movement to limit digital manipulatio n. Can't you see is a manual wind pocket watch movement? And even if it was one of those ultra rare 19th century pocket-watches with auromatic movement, how would it charge on a leg? Only if th...