georgeszaslavsky
1580
allow me to disagree with you, but here are my two cents
The 33xx is not suited for sports or even rough activities. Its construction is made of stamped parts and its unidirectional winding system are far to make of it a high class chrono movement. There has been three versions of the same movement in less than 10 years. I don't call that reliable nor heavy duty. This movement was heavily marketing hyped by the Hayek and his bunch of marketing hype people but the reality was and is still another one. It can't be compared to the standards that are the 4030, 4130 and zenith ep in terms of quality and reliability. The 9300 is a great thing that happens to Omega, entirely inhouse with dual barrels and not subcontracted by Piguet.
To clarify
By: dreamer8 : May 27th, 2011-04:11
I have read that the problems regarding reliability have been resolved.I am aware, as documented by the late chuck maddox about the problems.I am not comparing it to the Rolex 4030,4130 or the Zenith 410 chrono movements ( I have watches with all 3 moveme...
De mortuis ....
By: Marcus Hanke : June 1st, 2011-02:48
... nihil nisi bene. I will not comment on Chuck Maddox' articles, nor speculate on his motivation behind writing them. However, your choice of words strongly suggests that your problems with the cal. 33xx are rather problems with the owner family and her...
3303 is a fine movement
By: nilomis : May 29th, 2011-03:28
My cents: I know that this movement had issues in the past but those issues, after multiple complains, were fixed by Omega. The late and excellent Chuck Maddox conducted a major campaign against this movement, but I interpret those actions more as frustra...