Allow me to tempt you my friend.

Apr 13, 2024,16:02 PM
 




Yes, it has it flaws like the silly boat and plane on the sapphire case back, but it only adds to the quirky charm of this rather special piece. It has almost perfect proportions and looks like it was transported to the present in a time capsule.

Not too many simple 3-hand chronometers with a historical connection like this one. You should get one if you can.

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Omega Seamaster 1948. The re edition, not the original.

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-06:47
That one is growing on me... A lot! Best, Nicolas ...  

Had it several times on my wrist. It is really nice indeed! But it never made „click“ 😅

 
 By: MCG (Markus) : April 13th, 2024-08:00
Somwhow the fine hands do not fit the rather chunky case… for me. And btw the back is awful… ☺️

+1

 
 By: xto : April 13th, 2024-08:07

;-)

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-12:58

The case never convinced me.

 
 By: jlux : April 13th, 2024-08:31
Especially the bezel size against the overall case proportions did not work for me.

Beautiful and properly robust for daily drive. Unfortunately the legibility is poor with the silver hands on silver dial.

 
 By: hoseachandra : April 13th, 2024-09:02
Not good for my aging eyes. That's the main reason i did not buy it about 7-8 years ago

I see your point.

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-12:59

A really love this reference and came close to getting one hunting for a new ones at various omega boutique.

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : April 13th, 2024-11:13
I could not find one new and while I could certainly find nice one used, in the end legibility of these thin silver hands on a white dial were a no go for “me”.

Or you can go with the platinum case

 
 By: Derreck : April 13th, 2024-13:47
and get gold hands for better legibility…

Yes! But the price!!!

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-14:15
...  

Yep!

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-14:41

I agree this look better

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : April 13th, 2024-14:35

Definitely. A pity.

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-14:39

Yes!

 
 By: Derreck : April 13th, 2024-18:17
It was a tongue in cheek comment, sorry if I couldn’t convey it well. At that price range I would go for something else too, even though it’s a beautiful piece.

Totally!

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : April 13th, 2024-14:34

I find it one of the nicer re-editions…

 
 By: KMII : April 13th, 2024-12:08
And very stealthy to boot 👌🏻👍🏻 Finally went for the central seconds variety, with the chubby hands…

Yes, which is cool, too.

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-13:01

Every time I see one for sale I’m

 
 By: Champthekid : April 13th, 2024-12:31
tempted to pull the trigger and buy, but still have not done so. I’m not sure why because I really like it a lot. Maybe next time 😁

Same for me!

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-13:01

Nice looking watch

 
 By: TeutonicCarFan : April 13th, 2024-13:00
My issue is always the writing on the display caseback. I can't stand when manufacturers do it. PP also a culprit here.

Allow me to tempt you my friend.

 
 By: Horo_Traveler : April 13th, 2024-16:02
Yes, it has it flaws like the silly boat and plane on the sapphire case back, but it only adds to the quirky charm of this rather special piece. It has almost perfect proportions and looks like it was transported to the present in a time capsule. Not too ...  

After a few of your posts on this stunner, I was able to acquire one . . .

 
 By: Mach : April 13th, 2024-16:39
I really love this re-issue: The controversial display back: Can come across as slightly chunky: Can be difficult to tell time in certain lighting conditions: In the end, I sold it to make room for other pieces. But I’m having seller’s remorse!😢 I may try...  

There's the 2012 London Olympics model to consider . . .

 
 By: Dr No : April 14th, 2024-22:12
. . . as well. Solid caseback, too. ...  

Neither do I.

 
 By: amanico : April 13th, 2024-20:46

Thought so....

 
 By: lm6 : April 13th, 2024-21:08