sergio[Panerai Moderator]
5742
Matter of fact I didn't forget the OORs, I left them out on purpose....
They are, for all intent and purposes..bonified LE..and the controversy surrounding them is just a political/ethical one, IMO. If someone mentions the OOR status of the watch it's telling the truth, not misinterpreting on purpose to fleece the client
I share your...pain...
By: sergio : December 16th, 2017-19:48
my friend. Many a time, while forking out "silly" amounts of money for stuff with an ETA/UNITAS movement inside, I had the same thoughts. If only the bug had bit me earlier or if I had known the existence of certain models (which I got to know about much ...
Speaking about UNITAS ETA..
By: Echi : December 16th, 2017-20:45
I don’t mind that those pieces of old didn’t have an “inhouse” movement. In fact, I think part of the charm is that they were NOT inhouse. It just needed to WORK. I remember the first time that I cranked up that pre-owned Pam000 that I bought last year.. ...
In House Movements
By: clive.joel : December 17th, 2017-04:28
Are not necessarily better than the ETA/Valjoux movements that were used in the older models OP I, II, III etc. I was sold on my pam 87, 194, 64 for their design/looks rather than decorated movement. Each one of us have our own individual appeal for the b...