Officine Panerai

A quick picture of the Panerai PAM 587 Marina Militare.

Feb 03, 2023,23:46 PM

Taken some 4 years ago.

Isn't that the Panerai we like?

Best,

Nicolas

More posts: Marina MilitarePAM587Radiomir 1940

Comments: view entire thread

Much more than just “like”…

By: ArmisT : February 4th, 2023-02:24

this and the 673 are really special pieces.

Agreed.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-09:10

Yes! If I could only keep one ...

By: JohnFM : February 4th, 2023-04:16

... this would be it.

... and it wears like a Rolex 1016!

By: JohnFM : February 4th, 2023-04:17

just kidding

Ok, but a very big one, then. ;)

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-09:11

If only one? Most probably, indeed.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-09:11

Lovely panerai …

By: Ahoi : February 4th, 2023-06:34

Nowadays i probably would go with the 673

I guess it depends on how many Panerai you have with the typical crown guard.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-09:12

+1! This 587 is on my hit list for sure 😁

By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : February 4th, 2023-13:26

Jump on it before it is too late.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-15:41

Agreed! I do have to pace myself as I have a few possible incoming so can't get them all at once

By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : February 4th, 2023-16:17

True, too.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-16:19

For example the Laureato 38mm I just got was not planned :-)

By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : February 4th, 2023-16:22

That was an excellent catch.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-16:24

Me think so as well. Only problem is that it also triggered the desire to also add a 42mm Laureato! :-))

By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : February 4th, 2023-18:35

Great shot and one of the best. Probably almost prefect for one Pam in collection .

By: Ajas : February 4th, 2023-10:08

For set probably I would still choose 249 or 232, 662 and 673.

Great selection as a set. I would also include the 372.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-10:14

Ab, probably the best of regular production

By: Ajas : February 4th, 2023-12:15

Yep!

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-12:15

I almost pulled the trigger on one recently, but I had doubts about the seller so I passed!

By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : February 4th, 2023-13:30

Very sensible approach.

By: Ajas : February 4th, 2023-14:31

+1

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-15:41

And you did well. It is not impossible to find.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-15:41

That is some watch and photo!

By: KCLQMULKU : February 4th, 2023-14:11

Like it was taken only yesterday.

Thank you so much, my dear friend.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-15:42

What’s to argue It’s handsome.

By: aperna : February 4th, 2023-14:42

Thanks for commenting, my dear Tony.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-15:42

Highlights of the PAM587?

By: Capton : February 4th, 2023-20:27

I am not very familiar with Panerai and its history. Could you perhaps illustrate some of the traits of this watch that make it so special compared to the other Panerai watches? Many thanks, Tony

It has always been a long history between the Marina Militare and Panerai. It even is the raison d'être of this brand!

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-22:28

Many thanks for the information:)

By: Capton : February 4th, 2023-22:33

Pleasure. Here is an early one.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-22:39

Credit: DB Watches. ...

Very cool

By: Capton : February 4th, 2023-22:41

A Grail, a Myth, a Legend, a Dream.

By: amanico : February 4th, 2023-22:43

+1

By: Gelato Monster : February 5th, 2023-01:42

Perfect alternative to 36

By: Gelato Monster : February 5th, 2023-01:26

IMHO, avant-garde but uqually rugged yet more sophisticated.

Aaaah, the 36. I always prefered the Pre V MM, but the 36 is a very good one, and with a titanium case!

By: amanico : February 5th, 2023-06:33

Personally my cutout date is 2002 maybe maximum 2003 with 172..

By: Gelato Monster : February 5th, 2023-09:41

Thereafter Panerai lost their soul and rarely reborn (587 is one)

Or was it 2004? Now, they did a very nice 372, in 2012...

By: amanico : February 5th, 2023-22:14

I suppose 2004 is also ok, but

By: Gelato Monster : February 6th, 2023-00:47

IMHO for everything special in 2004, I can find similar and better at the year before.

There was the PAM 192 tantalum if my memory serves me well... ;)

By: amanico : February 6th, 2023-08:30

The best of 2004🙂

By: Gelato Monster : February 6th, 2023-08:51

Aaah, you see? ;)

By: amanico : February 6th, 2023-08:54

372 is nice but personally too big.

By: Gelato Monster : February 6th, 2023-00:49

I understand.

By: amanico : February 6th, 2023-08:30