1440
477
Relatively large gap....
You really think this is a large difference?
Certainly not debating that the case size here was a result of producing for the current market, but I personally don't see this as a movement lost in it's case like many I have encountered, especially when you take the inner bezel into account.
Cheers, Al
case size ALWAYS dictated by movement?
Greetings All- I was inspecting my MC Memovox today and noted the rather large size of its case. Aside from the alarm function, the watch is relatively simple (i think!). This observation got me thinking. Is there a lot of 'free space' in the case? Not to...
Movement is quite large - photo attached
Hello mjnoumoff, In the case of the Master Compressor Memovox, the case size is quite appropriate to the movement size. If you take a look at the photo below of my Memovox with the case back removed, you can see that the movement fills the case to a large...
great picture!!
thanks for the picture of the MC Memovox's movement! I have never seen the inside of 'my' watch's movement!! Very cool Thanks for all the great responses and for your opinions!! great pictures from everyone!! Great Duometre picts!
You are welcome
Here is another shot showing the gong on the case back for you reference. Cheers, Al...
Case size is more a design specification due to marketing aspects these days...
When JLC designed the MC Memovox, their intent was obviously to create a modern sport watch which had all the features that were 'in the air' at the time for a watch of this segment. Hence the size, and the compressor keys, which were a nice gimmic to be ...
Relatively large gap....
You really think this is a large difference? Certainly not debating that the case size here was a result of producing for the current market, but I personally don't see this as a movement lost in it's case like many I have encountered, especially when you...
indeed
Yes, I think the gap is pretty large in the case of the MC Alarm. As an illustration, almost the same movement (916, same dimensions), housed in a ref 875. Here, the gap is very narrow (less than 1mm)...
Relative to vintage...
without an inner rotating bezel, I can see your point. IMO relative to modern cases and movements, it's more than acceptable. In the case of the Master Compressor we have a 13''' movement in a 41.5 or so mm case. Compare that to some with 11.5''' movement...
As an aside, another example
From reading abot the development of the EWC, JLC initially had a goal of creating a watch with a 45mm diameter, but the shock absorption system and the strap changing mechanism required a case size of 46.3mm in the end. Another interesting example is the...
Not always
I have 2 perfect YES and NO examples: The Duo Metre case was conceived in coherence with the size of the movement. The MUT new generation ( it was also the case for the previous 34 mm version ) case was not dictated by the movement: Best, Nicolas...
these examples
show that plastic spacers are not common in JLC watches for a simple reason ( I think): they manufacture both the calibre and the case, so if they want a bigger MUT case, (from 34mm to 40mm), they just make the case bigger .
If the question is tn know if cases are dictiated by the movement
No, the MUT is not the exception... Have a look on some Reversos, among the simpler one, and you will notice the same. THere are several examples where a caliber was conceived for a watch regarding a certain case, and re used in a bigger watch. Another ex...
to me ...
re-using a calibre in a different case of a different size is not a problem at all. by comparison, using massive nylon spacers to fit an very small calibre into a large case is a bit ridiculous. for example, ETA calibres have been put in all sorts of case...