WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Jaeger-LeCoultre

Agree

 

Yes I agree, this document has errors or to say the least imprecisions in it.

The fact is this watch is a non-series production (I doubt it would even have a reference number), and it is likely there is not much information to produce on it (although having more info on its origin would be very interesting)

But it is the only such document I have, so I posted it to show that the 'categories' are sort of the same as in the current abstract.

This particular one is a bad example (because of lack of info on this special watch), but I have seen several others relating to more common watches, which had all the details in the same way we see them on the abstract from archives

 

  login to reply