One of my favorite games, the side by side picture. Just to better get the differences and subtle changes in one picture. Here you have three marvels. I would have hard time choosing one as my favorite. If the wording is the most important criterion, I wo...
but I actually lean more towards the Burgundy steel for its (i) more dynamic hands+markers (which are flat on the TT Reverso), and (ii) richer/deeper dial color. The above choice is answered with a contemporary mindset; however, the TT Reverso can’t be be...
I'm not a fan of gold, nor of the Duoface models, and I prefer the faceted hour markers and the richer colour of the Small Seconds. I appreciate them all, but it's an easy decision for me.
1. The RG case combined with the red dial gives a - for me - very satisfying combination. 2. I like the smaller subdial a little bit more. Important restriction: I made my judgment based on the pictures alone. Live on the wrist, it might be a different ma...
Love those Reversos, been thinking of adding one to the collection but I don’t think I’m confident enough to wear a shade of red. That said, I wish they had come out with the Burgundy dial in a steel case with the 2012 expressive hands! I might pick that ...
Just based on the pictures here alone, I will choose the TT red from 2012 which I do not have the chance to see in the metal yet. I prefer the hands on the TT red 2012 over the other two models. I have seen the stainless steel tribute small second burgund...
I love the "chemin de fer" of the TT1931 which seems not painted compared to the other ones. But overall, you are right, one cannot go wrong with any of them. Best, E. PS: dear Nicolas, you are bombarding us with delightful photos, thanks!!