Please, IWC, pretty please: Give us a faithful re edition of the B UHR.

Jul 17, 2020,02:36 AM
 

In a smaller size than the original, but still a bit big as the oversized case was part of its DNA, but 45, 46 mm ie enough! 


The Myth, the Legend, the Grail! 




Credit picture: IWC.

No date, eeeh? 

Best,

Nicolas

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

I wouldn’t be surprised they do one .... they’ve taken the big pilot concept to its limits now

 
 By: Explorertwo : July 17th, 2020-03:06
With perpetual calendar etc...
login to reply

Yes, the simpler, the better, for me; [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:46
login to reply

IWC B-UHR

 
 By: RG1 : July 17th, 2020-03:12
Sterile dial, no date and manual winding, 40 mm I wish....
login to reply

Well, why not, too. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:46
login to reply

The original or the hypothetical re edition? [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:47
login to reply

This design is sublime, engineering too

 
 By: VinnieD : July 17th, 2020-05:55
But these watches are too charged politically for my taste
login to reply

Aaah, I see your point. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:47
login to reply

I am in. Where do I sign? 😆 [nt]

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : July 17th, 2020-20:08
login to reply

:-)))) (nt)

 
 By: Echi : July 17th, 2020-20:23
..
login to reply

Hehehehe...What I had in mind. ;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-23:49
login to reply

No Date and No Power Reserve Indicator on Dial!

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : July 17th, 2020-07:51
And, no limited edition either. Yeah, one can only dream...👍
login to reply

Or a LE just for us? One can dream! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:47
login to reply

Now you're talking 😂 [nt]

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : July 19th, 2020-18:49
login to reply

Any good connection with IWC? ;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 19th, 2020-21:28
login to reply

Damn!

 
 By: Ted-Lo : July 17th, 2020-10:41
Official Beast!!
login to reply

What I think too. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:48
login to reply

Seriously

 
 By: Brandon Skinner : July 17th, 2020-12:20
What’s the hold up?
login to reply

No hold up, just a dream. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-15:48
login to reply

;) One more for this one. Great. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 19th, 2020-23:39
login to reply

I’m in for a this version; no date no PR indicator Pilot

 
 By: darrony : July 20th, 2020-10:17
Although I personally love the PR indicator complication; I heavily prefer on the back; but I do not like IWC’s implementation of PR indicator in the back (atleast the ones I have see ). I prefer manual wind, but would accept automatic. Let’s get this ver... 
login to reply

Thanks for your support, Darrony. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 20th, 2020-10:20
login to reply

I know what you mean...

 
 By: India Whiskey Charlie : July 20th, 2020-10:34
Not a fan either but as long as it's on the back, I don't care that much: ...  
login to reply

Not my cup of tea, either. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 20th, 2020-14:15
login to reply

Oh yes. Manual wind please! [nt]

 
 By: ChristianDK : July 30th, 2020-01:54
login to reply

Ok, one more here! Thanks, Christian. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 30th, 2020-03:24
login to reply