India Whiskey Charlie[IWC Moderator]
7353
I know what you mean...
Jul 20, 2020,10:34 AM
Not a fan either but as long as it's on the back, I don't care that much:
Comments:
view entire thread
Please, IWC, pretty please: Give us a faithful re edition of the B UHR.
By: amanico : July 17th, 2020-02:36
In a smaller size than the original, but still a bit big as the oversized case was part of its DNA, but 45, 46 mm ie enough! The Myth, the Legend, the Grail! Credit picture: IWC. No date, eeeh? Best, Nicolas ...
IWC B-UHR
By: RG1 : July 17th, 2020-03:12
Sterile dial, no date and manual winding, 40 mm I wish....
Damn!
By: K-Lo : July 17th, 2020-10:41
Official Beast!!
Seriously
By: Brandon Skinner : July 17th, 2020-12:20
What’s the hold up?
I’m in for a this version; no date no PR indicator Pilot
By: Darron : July 20th, 2020-10:17
Although I personally love the PR indicator complication; I heavily prefer on the back; but I do not like IWC’s implementation of PR indicator in the back (atleast the ones I have see ). I prefer manual wind, but would accept automatic. Let’s get this ver...
I know what you mean...
By: India Whiskey Charlie : July 20th, 2020-10:34
Not a fan either but as long as it's on the back, I don't care that much: ...