Goldenlutin
261
well my point is...
that it might be" funny" to have the balance wheel in the middle of the movement but the way it was done by BH just does not make sense because 3/4 of the movement are not used. It looks like if a small lady-size movement was put into a big movement. This makes no sense for me either aesthetically nor technically. I cannot remember any other movement which has so much empty space in it for nothing. If you look closely you will notice that all the gear train and the barrel are on the same little spot and that the rest is a "mechanical desert". I am not asking for a chronometer here but also not for "l'art pour l'art".
If you take the central tourbillon from Omega (in which BH was actually involved as he worked for Omega at this time if I remember right), the movement is more or less fully used. The same for BH H1 ( which is technically very close to the Omega...). Even the MB&F LM1 is not empty even if they had to use two fourth wheels for that. This was aesthetically quite clever (and technically the simplest way) as you do not notice straightaway that the balance wheel is missing (as it is located dial side).
Regarding the double barrel, this would have been easily possible if you connect the two in series by an addition gear. Obviously this would have been a bite more technicall demanding...
Talking about the barrel, I wonder how long the power reserve of the H11 might be. Not especially long I guess.
These are just my very personal thoughts.
Hope some others will also join the discussion.