I see what you mean but it's not about liking it or not as one cannot, obviously, argue about individual tastes. As watchmaking is still (or only) micro-mechanics at the end, there are technical solutions that can be objectively qualified as being better than others and certain rules that can be respected/ followed or not. Movement finish can be good or bad, a watch can be COSC or not, fullfill the requirements of the poinçon de Genève or not, etc. It's not about the look of the watch or the person behind it (as a side note: I personally do appreciate BH and most of his work). What I miss sometimes (should I say more and more) on The Purists is that there are less and less critical analysis/discussions about the mechanical qualities or interest of a watch. Certain watchmakers or sponsor brands became holy cows and they can do what ever they want and everybody is just supposed to applaud. If I am supposed to mechanically/systematically post a "like", I can as well go on Instagram.