nafetS
1997
So that fraudulent people can't use your watch for their actions.
Apr 30, 2020,02:01 AM
At least the case number is only known by the owner and Grönefeld. In this case also the fact which limitation number is connected to which case number. If someone uses censored pictures for some form of fraud, it will be just any one Remontoire. If they got the exact case and limitation number, YOUR watch will be part of the fraud. As I said, I might be too cautious. However the work of censoring these numbers is very easy and short compared to the risks, Imho.
Comments:
view entire thread
Photography Feedback
By: R : April 30th, 2020-00:38
Dear fellow purists, I would like to receive some feedback on this photo of my 1941 Remontoire... What could I improve and how could I make the anglage pop a bit more? Thank you in advance.. ISO 100 - 1/250 - F20 with flash was the set up for this picture...
Thank you! haha ;)
By: R : April 30th, 2020-00:51
Yeah, I might have to start stacking multiple pictures...
Thank you.
By: R : April 30th, 2020-01:04
I'll give it a try. After zoom out and stack them into one picture might work...
Meaning..
By: R : April 30th, 2020-01:05
Having the flash bounce from more angles? Sounds like an idea! thank you.
Thanks!
By: R : April 30th, 2020-01:08
But if I want the anglage the come out better in this shot, it would be possible as well?
Thank you for your feedback.
By: R : April 30th, 2020-01:47
I've read that before, why would it be smart to photoshop those numbers out? I never really understood it.
So that fraudulent people can't use your watch for their actions.
By: nafetS : April 30th, 2020-02:01
At least the case number is only known by the owner and Grönefeld. In this case also the fact which limitation number is connected to which case number. If someone uses censored pictures for some form of fraud, it will be just any one Remontoire. If they ...
Makes sense..
By: R : April 30th, 2020-02:10
Thanks for your explanation.
Very nice watch
By: toxly347 : April 30th, 2020-01:16
I like the photo too. I am no expert and I do not own a usable flash, but I think f20 is a tad small.
F Stop
By: R : April 30th, 2020-01:22
I used F20 because I wanted everything in focus and sharp. Which F Stop would you suggest?
Don't ask me difficult questions
By: toxly347 : April 30th, 2020-01:35
But I would have to say that in my macro the depth of field is so small that I try to get the sweet spot around f8 and place my trust on my dependable Photoshop to do the stacking. Also, I take lots of photos and occasionally I get the one that was on my ...
I would be so pleased
By: sham1 : April 30th, 2020-02:29
if I could take photos like you. The fact that my Nokia has a 0.2 megapixel camera does not help either!
Euh???
By: Jurry : April 30th, 2020-02:54
Improve? There is nothing to improve. In my view it’s an incredibly good picture. If anything at all you might consider 1 stop plus on ISO By the way, the subject of the photo is also superb
Amazing feedback.
By: R : April 30th, 2020-07:32
Thank you Mike, I shot this picture with my Canon 80D and a Canon EF 100mm Macro lens. I checked out Helicon Focus, which I was not familiar with, and it looks easy for stacking. I'll get right back at it tonight and will contact you if I run into any pro...
This is already now a great photo of a very fine watch.
By: jlux : April 30th, 2020-04:30
As others have said, a simple light box with external and movable light sources (5000-5600 k) would give you more options. By adjusting the position of the light sources you have more freedom to achieve the wanted results.
Here is my 5 cents
By: Jocke - Bad Santa : May 1st, 2020-08:36
That pic is good but a little dark. The two most important things is a good lightning and a good macro lens. When it comes to product photographing so is a fixed lightning the best you can have because then you can adjust control the light and see the res...