pinkpanther,
Since you asked for an opinion, I will grasp the nettle and give one -- mine.
I rarely make public statements as there is no 'PuristS' right and wrong for opinions.
Objectively, one has to make a judgement based on what emotions that a Voutilainen or Journe piece evokes when you can see, feel, listen and whatever other senses are called into play.
I have seen both men's products. I have owned many Journe pieces and only kept 3 pieces.
Voutilainen's work is better. (There -- a rare, bold and bald PuristS statement)
Journe's watches produce but a fleeting and ephemeral 'good feeling' until you look closer or until the passage of time reveals flaw after flaw.
Voutilainen's 'masterpieces' have a depth of quality beyond comprehension. There may be 'flaws' that mere mortals cannot see.....for surely, if it is by mortal hand, there should be mortal shortcomings? That be the theory.
Alas, I am also mortal and cannot see anything but 'perfection', even with brow-creasing intensity of scrutiny!
Regards, MTF