WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Umm..part 2.

 

"It would be a magnet and a balance wheel in one part. Is it what you mean?" Yes. Should have worded that better.

Regulation via screws, If I'm interpreting you correcty, you're saying that the balance wheel is required to provide the opportunity for fine regulation? Makes sense. Add the balance wheel with screws to allow the inertia to match the magnetic force for a given amplitude.

As for no longer needed a tourbillion...who said you needed one in the first place? smile

Yes, with this design the centre of inertia will stay in the say place, but gravity will still affect the balance. in that magnet 'spring', you effectively have two weights on the end of arm. so when the balance is horizontal, gravity will have a lesser effect than when it is vertical. This could be cancelled out by making the entire magnet/sping disc of the same density...? How 'tunable' are magnets...

I just see this this as having an interesting concept, but easily disappearing in aspiral of compromises...like does the impulse pin need to made bigger? How does this affect the inertia of the anchor? how much bearing support does the blance shaft now require? how much more friction does that bring? So now how strong do the magnets have to be? which increases the moment of inertia, which on and on....

When they show us a working one instead of press release renderings...(look at the difference in their V4 prototype versus the 'production' version....)...I might start to drop my skepticism.

Good discussion, dknespl.

This message has been edited by BDLJ on 2010-03-29 19:12:25

  login to reply