AndrewD[HoMe Moderator]
12829
The Cabestan ...
... was another watch that kicked around for a long time. I won't pretend to know the whole history of the development of that watch, but the few tidbits that come out are interesting.
Andrew
Manufacture
By: AndrewD : February 22nd, 2010-15:31
Hi Jeff, Overall I like the industrial look to the watch and the design of the plates and bridges. Whether it is worth the money is another, more personal, issue and we have touched on perceived ‘value’ in many previous discussions. All I will say is that...
At a minimum ...
By: AndrewD : February 22nd, 2010-21:22
... I guess a new development has to be at least as good as existing 'technology'. We wouldn't want our mechanical watches performing chronometrically worse than they already do. But intrinsically we are not against doing things in different ways, are we?...
Well said.
By: BDLJ : February 23rd, 2010-15:31
Jeff, I'd take it further. I cannot see how belts are in any way even equivalent to gears. The friction involved on torque transmission has to be far far greater than gears, I can't see a way to get around this - compare the proto belts to the final produ...
Development time …
By: AndrewD : February 22nd, 2010-15:39
When I think about long evolution I think of Opus 3 and this TAG V4. It seems like an age since the first prototypes were shown and until working watches were available. There are probably many watches, particularly from the large manufacturers, that do n...
BNB going away is sad
By: JMan : February 23rd, 2010-08:06
BNB model for me was interesting. They represented a path for a lot of companies that did not have the in-house talent to bring to market some high end technology. As such they were "commoditizing" high end technology. We can argue whether this is a good ...