Thanks everybody. It is really nice to see that some of you are reacting with passion.
First of all, the only real reason for rules is that the rules excist in order to be violated. Nicholas recommended me the Lange Anniversary. It does not fit into my collection but still I have basically decided to buy it. I have also bought things like Breguet Tradition, VC Jubileum, etc. So these are exceptions and the exceptions are always a lot of fun!
Secondly, when thinking and planning to leave the watches to the next generation, the future value of the watches is not a big concern. I do not think that analythical investing to watches is possible.
Thirdly, sorry for my ignorance. I thought that the new 9000 movements of Panerai are built by Panerai. So I should never believe advertising... I know perfectly well that i.e. Patek has been using, and they still probably are, base movements built by others. So what... As long as Patek has finished those movements up to their standards.
The main issue for me is finally that there are so many lovely watches I would like to own but can not afford to buy. That is the main reason that from the beginning I decided to buy watches made by the traditional manufacturers. I am already over 50 so I will let the younger and richer people buy some of those wonderful watches produced by the producers without long history.
I surely will, one day, show my collection on these pages. However, there is not going to be anything very sexy except one piece I have reserved from the Far East. I will show that still this year. That new and very nice watch probably fits best to the fourth, unlisted and biggest cathegory of my collection. The Exceptions of the Rules.
All the best,