patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
28404
Is It Just Me? Are These Auction House Photos Really Awful?
Apr 20, 2022,22:58 PM
The watch business is good. Watches seem to sell themselves. Auction houses are also in a rush. Once they start receiving watches, their small team is overwhelmed! Cataloguers need to photograph the watches, write descriptions, and inventory hundreds of lots. Most auction houses have tiny watch department (the money and the prestige for most auction houses comes from the art department) and are borrowing personnel from cataloguers, writers, and photographers from the art department - art department personnel often know very little about watches unfortunately.
This auction house is kind of new to the watch world. Well, not exactly, but not a major player. Here are some really clumsy examples of how shoddy their photographs are... I won't even go into the poorly written descriptions. But take a look at these photos below, is it just my expectations are too high? Or are these photos just really poorly done? I feel sorry for the consignors...
This watch is obviously in bad condition, and the photograph definitely shows it. But doesn't this watch just look extremely unappealing? I'm not advocating that the auction house touch up the photo, but I would imagine that they clean up the watch a bit. The strap between the lugs shows a poorly fitting strap, the dirt and grime of the watch is still not cleaned as skin and dust can be seen between the lugs. The auction house here is really doing a disservice to the consignor. Although, one could argue, they are doing a solid for the future buyer, as the future buyer will probably get this watch for a bargain price! But in reality, this watch failed to sell during the day of the auction. Photo credit: Bonhams
All that dust and dirt on the strap wasn't worth cleaning prior to photographing this watch? Could the auction house be any lazier? Well, this watch did sell in the auction. So I guess there's probably a satisfied seller. Maybe the buyer is happy? Maybe he would've had more competition on the watch if the photograph were done better? Photo credit: Bonhams
Again, the dust and grime between the links of the bracelet and how the photograph shows a ray of light between the lug and the bracelet just shows lack of attention to detail in this auction house photograph. This watch sold for a lot of money, so perhaps the photos didn't hurt the result in this case. I decided to include this example even though it doesn't entirely help my argument. But it does show that the auction house's photographer isn't very skilled on photographing watches. Maybe this photographer prefers to photograph fine art instead! Photo credit: Bonhams.
What are your thoughts? Do you think this auction house could've done better on their photographs? Or maybe we should hope all auction houses take photographs like this in the future, to show every flaw and imperfection. I'm not a supermodel, but if I were a manager for a supermodel, I'd be asking the photographer to capture my client in a better light!