WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

I agree, this is very disturbing IMHO

 

Hi Guys,

I don't have anything much to add except to say that I don't think one can separate "the movement" from the "fancy under-dial gubbins to position the hands". 

I understand the point on some level (the movement is not pretending to be a GO movement in terms of architecture or finishing on the bridge side), but the under the dial work is every bit a part of the movement and often all that distinguishes one form another.  Take J*D movements for instance.  They are proprietary movements for the most part, but only by virtue of the under-dial gubbins. 

The bottom line to me is that if Armani is using the movement with these display components in place then they are using a counterfeit movement.  Or a movement that only exists because of counterfeit watches.  Or something,  And it's wrong.

_john

  login to reply