WatchFred
176
Breitling has a problem respecting it's own heritage
the hands are clearly wrong for the Old Navitimer II - a shame that they could not get you correct hands (I can't think of a model these would be correct for, btw.) , I think you should contact Breitling Switzerland and insist on getting this right.
It get's even worse, a lot worse with true vintage icons, I have seen Breitling Switzerland put totally incorrect hands on a SuperOcean ref. 1004 from 1957, irreparably spoiling a rare beauty; I never ever would have them work on a piece from my vintage collection.
On a side note: even the claim that Breitling "introduced the Navitimer in 1952" has been proven to be incorrect; the first Navitimer were shipped to AOPA in 1954, still without the "806" model reference and using the Valjoux R72 - all Navitimers that have serial numbers that would put them in the 1952 and 1953 production years have all the specifics of 1959 to 1960 production runs (less rice beads on the bezel, different AOPA logos, WOG instead of BOW import markings and all have Venus 178 movements) - apparently a batch of cases was incorrectly numbered with a leading 8 instead of the correct leading 9 - and voila, 1952 Navitimers.
Sorry for taking this a bit off topic, but your Navitimer hands just prove again how low the respect of Breitling is for it's own stellar heritage - quite hard to accept for a true aficionado.