WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

A lot has to do with the perceived status of platinum...

 

...but of course, as others have already posted, it's also more difficult and considerably more costly to machine.


Platinum will also wear better than gold due to it's hardness, which makes it less susceptible to damage from use. That's an added benefit in my eyes and may justify a bit of the difference.

I don't think the status issue will change unless gold prices rise considerably more and then stay that way for a very long time. But that's just my opinion.

And don't forget, a gold watch can cost $10K or $20K+ more than the same watch in stainless...that's the real puzzle in my eyes. What, other than status, can possible make a gold watch that much more costly than it's steel counterpart?
This message has been edited by Emil Wojcik on 2012-02-08 11:19:00

  login to reply