amanico
[JLC Moderator]
405002
You are right, it is slightly too big, this minute hand. To be honest, I checked that detail after reading your comment. Yes, to me, the 5510 and the Geophysic UT are, with this one, the best WT. [nt]
No message body
World Time by Girard Perregaux: 1966 WW TC versus WW TC Small Seconds.
Here is the picture: WW TC Small Seconds on the Left, 1966 WW TC on the right. 41 mm big and 11 mm high for the WW TC Small Seconds, 40 mm big and 12 mm high for the 1966 WW TC. Here, I would love to see the dial of the WW TC in the 1966, as I prefer the ...
WWTC Small Seconds
all the Time! I find the 1966 too elegant, too refined for a traveller watch! The Small Second is much more sportier and versatile for this purpose! Yours, Adam ...
I've been hunting this ww.tc small seconds for years...
There is just one minor flaw to my eyes which is the length of the hands. When compared side by side with the minute hand of the chronograph the length of the minute hand on the chronograph seems to be just right whereas on the small seconds the minute ...