amanico
[JLC Moderator]
342430
World Time by Girard Perregaux: 1966 WW TC versus WW TC Small Seconds.
Here is the picture:
WW TC Small Seconds on the Left, 1966 WW TC on the right.
41 mm big and 11 mm high for the WW TC Small Seconds, 40 mm big and 12 mm high for the 1966 WW TC.
Here, I would love to see the dial of the WW TC in the 1966, as I prefer the case of the 1966.
But one thing is sure, Girard Perregaux knows how to make nice world time watches.
And the funny thing is that Girard Perregaux introduced the WW TC Chrono in the very early 2000's, like Patek did, with the 5110.
Both were pioneers in that kind of watch for a modern wrist watch.
Best,
Nicolas
World Time by Girard Perregaux: 1966 WW TC versus WW TC Small Seconds.
Here is the picture: WW TC Small Seconds on the Left, 1966 WW TC on the right. 41 mm big and 11 mm high for the WW TC Small Seconds, 40 mm big and 12 mm high for the 1966 WW TC. Here, I would love to see the dial of the WW TC in the 1966, as I prefer the ...
WWTC Small Seconds
all the Time! I find the 1966 too elegant, too refined for a traveller watch! The Small Second is much more sportier and versatile for this purpose! Yours, Adam ...
I've been hunting this ww.tc small seconds for years...
There is just one minor flaw to my eyes which is the length of the hands. When compared side by side with the minute hand of the chronograph the length of the minute hand on the chronograph seems to be just right whereas on the small seconds the minute ...
