Girard Perregaux

Here is the picture: WW TC Small Seconds on the Left, 1966 WW TC on the right. 41 mm big and 11 mm high for the WW TC Small Seconds, 40 mm big and 12 mm high for the 1966 WW TC. Here, I would love to see the dial of the WW TC in the 1966, as I prefer the ...  

No message body

all the Time! I find the 1966 too elegant, too refined for a traveller watch! The Small Second is much more sportier and versatile for this purpose! Yours, Adam ...  

There is just one minor flaw to my eyes which is the length of the hands. When compared side by side with the minute hand of the chronograph the length of the minute hand on the chronograph seems to be just right whereas on the small seconds the minute ...