I had the top photo (the earlier version of the two) and was stupid to trade it in toward something else. Loved the asymmetric dial and the little day/night indicator in French. The bracelet is very comfortable and the hidden hometime hand was a nice feat...
and I am very happy with it, versatile, waterproof, elegant enough for dinner, flies under the radar, can adjust to timezones on the fly. It is not especially slim though. Best Andreas
Both are great timepieces. As for which one, i think it’s personal choice and taste. I really like the fact that GMT is a really functional complication - that i have used over and over again. Personally i prefer the symmetry of the 2nd picture.
Wow i didn’t notice until you pointed it out. The day / night pattern is amazing - certainly different as compared to other implementation of day night function in other JLC lines.
I have the cousin of those watches, same generation, same movement. It was my daily wearer for 8 years... I adore this watch. Tough SOB, and is still within a second or two, 10 years in, no service (though it is finally out for service now just to keep it...
As I said, performs flawlessly. True GMT, can move hands forward, backwards, date as well (though no quick date). The other thing I love about it is, it was designed by a woman-- Magali Metrailler, and was IMHO, the last "Polaris"-ish JLC tool watch *befo...
newer version, i.e. the one in your second photo. I like the Ulysse Nardin style dial lay out. There is just one thing I would like to improve in that watch: remove the home hand. It is quite intrusive and not needed as the 24 hour subdial tells home time...
I owned the first model and found it easy to use. I've since sold it to a business partner of mine, who hasn't really used it. I wouldn't say it's very thin by my standards. But the watch wore well!
The bracelet was well made. Comfortable, well articulated. Pins though, not screws. Had two quick adjustment releases (for wrist expansion in the summer). It was overall a well made bracelet, but to be critical, I prefer a screw system of a pin system. Ho...
...you mentioned the thinness (or lack thereof), i've read it's about 11.5mm thick (which is probably ok for me) but I haven't seen it in the metal so not sure if it wears larger on the wrist
There is no formal definition for "thin" in watch terms. "Extra plat" or "extra thin" conventionally means a movement that is thinner than 3mm, usually around 2mm in total movement thickness. But since there's no formal definition for "thin" so nobody can...
I would chose the AM version, but also, have you considered a Reverso Duo? With the Hometime, i would always be unsurz on what is home and what is away. No doubt with the Reverso. Keep us posted! Best, E.