TheMadDruid
20635
Curious about PuristS' thoughts.
WatchTime Magazine recently published an interview with Jack Kingston, a pretty well-known collector. One question posed to him caught my attention.
The question: How do you select watches?
JK's answer: "Here's an interesting dimension to it and this is how the human mind can always come up with an excuse for another watch. So you say, 'I need a dress watch,' so then you get a dress watch. 'I need a chronograph! You know, come to think of it, I think I need a split-second chronograph, too,' and then, 'I need a dress chronograph. My dress watch is rose gold, but sometimes I think I'm going to wear white metal so I better get a white metal dress watch.' You just go down this list and you can always find a rationalization for something new, and that's fun."
Personally, I find myself looking at certain brands to see if they have something I "need". But I do buy pieces in the manner that Kingston suggests. RG dress watch, but I also need WG because I have this suit/pants/jacket that WG might go better with. I need another sport chronograph; but a dress chrono would be a good option when I don't feel like wearing a three-hander, etc. etc. And of course there is always the anarchic buying spree-I don't have a diver gee there are so many good-looking divers I better not limit myself to just one oh that one's a great buy how can I not have a (brand) or (brand).
How do you chose your purchases? Is anything Jack Kingston says relevant to you? I'd love to hear other PuristS' decision-making process.