W72
857
Interesting comparison of the PP and LUC
First I must say I do not have enough knowledge of GS to compare.
I do have a manual spring drive (among the earlier version) but this is another animal altogether.
From what limited comparison I can make between the SD and LUC - I think the
movement finishing level of the LUC is still higher. The differences stand out even more under a loupe.
Looking at Kong's photo of the PP 240PS and the LUC 1,96 I wonder why the
PP has 27 jewels while LUC 32. Both are "petite second" movement.
What are the extra jewels for? The LUC also seems to have more components and is heavier.
On the finishing level - they sure looked comparable.
Movement comparison....
By: Jacky : August 14th, 2008-08:09
Dear purists, Out of curiosity....how would you compare a Grand Seiko movement finishing to a Chopard LUC in general? I was told by some friends that the Seiko is actually superior over LUC which i beg to differ....any thoughts? Regards
About the jewels...
By: Kong : August 16th, 2008-01:30
Watch72, thanks for the reply. I've seen the GS GMT....casework is superb. The dial, hands and indices are very well-finished. The SD should be as good too. The picture was by SteveG... indeed the L.U.C and PP finishing level is comparable. If you sample ...
LUC vs. Grand Seiko
By: mikesprang : August 15th, 2008-22:58
The Grand Seiko is a very nice watch, but not anywhere near the level of finishing of the LUC. They are just in different leagues and different price ranges to match. In my opinion, the Geneva Seal LUC movements are some of the very best finished in the w...
You are right, Jacky...
By: Kong : August 17th, 2008-09:23
Regardless with or without Geneva Seal, the spirit and work done on finishing is of the same high-standard. The subtle extras with the Geneva Seal certified pieces are the dial material is gold, swan-neck regulator and overcoil hairspring. Kong